If you cannot see the graphics for this invitation please click here.

Spring 2008 Series

 

Elements of Seismic Data Processing

Wendy Ohlhauser

March 4 or 6

more info

 

Migration: Time or Depth? Kirchhoff or Wave Equation?

Jianhua Pan

March 11 or 13

 

How can seismic attributes aid the geophysicist in making accurate interpretations?

Satinder Chopra

March 18 or 20

more info

 

Reliable density inversion and application in mapping reservoir heterogeneity for heavy oil in WCSB

Yong Xu

April 8 or 10

more info

 

Spectral decomposition applications and thin-bed reflectivity inversion

Satinder Chopra

April 15 or 17

more info

 

Rock Properties & AVO analysis

Yong Xu

April 22 or 24

more info

 

Seismic Operations 101

Brad Torry

April 29

more info

 

Seismic Data Marketing

Brad Torry

May 1

more info

 

To RSVP for any of the above seminars,

click here.

 

For more information contact Florence Janzen at 781.1437

 

www.arcis.com

Lunch and Learn Seminars
Spring 2008

 

*NEW TOPIC*

Migration: Time or Depth? Kirchhoff or Wave Equation?

 

Presented by Jianhua Pan

March 11th or March 13th, 2008

11:55 to 1 pm (lunch provided)

Suite 2600, 111 - 5th Ave SW

East Petro-Canada Tower

 

Limited seating, click here to RSVP

 

This is the second in a series of lunch & learn seminars, see the sidebar for information on the other topics.

 

Migration is an important step in the seismic data processing workflow. Over the last couple of decades, many techniques have been developed for both time and depth migration. In general, there are two families of migration methods, Kirchhoff and wave equation.

 

There are many differences between time migration and depth migration. The most obvious difference is the output display of the migrated traces. Besides, time migration has a single output that is the image. The imaging velocity (rms velocity) it produces does not have any physical meaning. However, depth migration generates a dual output, i.e. the image as well as the interval velocity. Part of this talk will show differences between time and depth migrations from the point of view of the algorithms used and also in terms of the application on real seismic data.

  

With regards to migration methods, the Kirchhoff method is still very popular in our industry, though the wave equation technique is widely accepted and applied. Since both methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, it may not be advisable to comment on which is better. The Kirchhoff method is accepted as the main method for time migration as it affords the convenience of being able to directly use rms velocity. For depth migration, the Kirchhoff method is used for velocity analysis and the wave equation method is used for final migration. There are some obvious questions that come to mind, the foremost one being: can the wave equation method be applied for time migration with rms velocity and for velocity analysis in depth migration? This talk will not only answer this question but also show some basic concepts as well as differences between Kirchhoff and wave equation methods. This presentation will help you decide which particular migration needs to be adopted for your seismic data.

 

To learn more, attend the lunch & learn session on March 11th or 13th. Click here to RSVP.

 

This course is available as a free in-house seminar. For more information contact Florence Janzen, 781-1437 or email fjanzen@arcis.com.